"...whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life." - John 4:14 KJV
“Fools mock at sin, but among the upright there is favor.” (Proverbs 14:9)
A guilt offering is the required response to all sins, for it represents the God-given means by which sin is cleansed and forgiven. While the Old Testament Israelite made a guilt offering with the blood of animals, Christians look by faith to the blood of Christ shed on the cross for the cleansing and forgiveness of their sins (Hebrews 9:13-14, 22). Practically speaking, if a man mocks sin, he is sure to mock any notion of guilt before God and of any requirement that he seek cleansing and forgiveness from God for sin. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that fools mock sin, guilt, and guilt offerings, and the meaning of the passage is not changed by the interchange of these words. In any case, we get a clear picture of foolishness.
I know of a business that decided a couple of years ago to give a bottle of wine to each of its friends, clients and associates as a year-end gift. The particular wine that they chose was called “The Seven Deadly Zins.” On the back of the label on the bottle was a narrative that mocked each one of the sins known as the seven deadly sins such as gluttony and pride. I visited the wine maker’s website and found a couple of grinning proprietors who were clearly proud of their contemptuous treatment of the whole concept of sin and guilt. The conclusion of their description of this wine went as follows: “With the tilt of the glass, I commit seven zins, Oh Lord, with your help... I'll do it again. Indulge!” In this offensive language, we get a clear picture of what it means to mock sin, guilt and a guilt offering. The proprietors are fools according to our verse.
The slew of commercials from the recent broadcast of the Superbowl also gives us many telling examples of what it means to mock sin. From the college-aged drunkards who literally bowed down at the wall of their room that miraculously revolved every now and then and put them face to face with a refrigerator full of beer, to the husbands that lied to their wives about fixing their houses for the sake of their love of pleasure and laziness, to the woman who gloried in her shame of being divorced multiple times, to the idolatry of the luxury automobile commercials, it was clear that the marketers not only knew how to mock sin, but that the mockery of sin sells!
Mockery of sin is not the only behavior of fools. They also trust in their own hearts to make decisions (Proverbs 28:26), despise godly instruction (Proverbs 15:5) and deny that God exists (Psalm 14:1).
“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for biter!” (Isaiah 5:20).
Making a mockery of sin is not a modern invention. Its roots are as ancient as sin itself, for in the Beginning, that fallen angel Satan mocked sin when he challenged its consequences to Eve. “Then the serpent said to the woman, ‘You will not surely die’” (Genesis 3:4). The serpent said this in complete contradiction to the word of God, which said that death would be the penalty for disobedience. Just as that abominable wine label challenged what Christians know to be the penalty for sin as revealed in Scripture (i.e., eternal death), that serpent of old challenged the stated penalty for sin in the Garden of Eden. Moreover, just as that wine label presented the benefits of the seven deadly sins as being “untold pleasure”, the serpent lied and told Eve that her disobedience would bring divine wisdom. Since that horrible event took place, the Devil has been using all sorts of schemes throughout history to get people to look upon evil and dangerous behaviors as though they were good and beneficial.
One of these schemes is to take the sting out of words that have historically been reserved to represent sin and evil. Take the word “covet” for example. My dictionary defines covet this way: “To wish for enviously” or “To desire (what belongs to another) inordinately or culpably” or, lastly, “To feel inordinate desire for what belongs to another.” Clearly, all of these definitions describe sinful behavior. The word appears for the first time in Exodus 20 in the giving of the Ten Commandments in the New King James Version and it describes the sin in which a man desires to possess something that belongs to someone else. The commandment reads “You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife . . . nor anything that is your neighbor’s” (Exodus 20:17). There is no place in the Bible where the word, “covet” represents anything but sin. However, I’ve heard Christians ask for prayers by saying “I covet your prayers.” I’m sure the motive in these cases is almost always sincere, for it takes humility to ask for prayer. However, somehow, that great schemer of old has managed to get Christians to use words reserved for evil under the auspices of good. When a Christian asks for prayers this way, he is mocking the sin of covetousness, albeit ignorantly, for he is conveying the idea that there is a good form of coveting, but there is not! Another example is the way we may preface a point we really want others to listen to by saying “To be honest. . . ” or “Honestly . . . .” On its face, this implies that we may or may not be honest in other circumstances, which essentially is an implicit confession of dishonesty on its face. If we were more sensitive to the word of God that says that liars will burn in the lake of fire (Revelation 21:8), rather than the buzz of the world all around us, I suspect that we would be far less likely to play around with the idea of dishonesty this way. Yet the lexicons of the day are being forged by the serpent of old so that slowly but surely the evil nature of sin as revealed in the Bible is whittled away one word at a time.
“The law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for fornicators, for sodomites, for kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine, according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God which was committed to my trust” (1 Timothy 1:9-11).
Note that the use of the law for the “lawless and insubordinate” is actually “according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God.” The law of God is complementary to the blessed Gospel of grace. Each needs the other. Christians are to love their neighbors, but they are to hate their sin and expose it with the word of God that “judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart” (Hebrews 4:12). Indeed, Christians are to hate even the sin they find in themselves, so that they can exclaim with the apostle Paul, “O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death?” (Romans 7:24). The relationship between loving our neighbor and hating sin is born out in Scripture. For example, in Jude, Christians are given advice on evangelism, when it says, “others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire, hating even the garment defiled by the flesh” (Jude v.23).
There is no substitute for the law of God in this matter either; if left to themselves to come up with a definition of sin, men will inevitably water it down to standards that they can keep, which is what the Pharisees are experts at doing. They do this under the auspices of scholarship, expertise with languages and mind-numbing intellectual gymnastics—however, the end result is always the same: sin as revealed in the Bible is no longer sin. This is precisely what has happened in so many churches that have replaced the preaching of the word of God with the humanistic notions of psychology, so that we no longer voluntarily make ourselves drunkards and sodomites, but we have “addictions” and “struggles” rooted in past “wounds” inflicted upon us. We no longer create one idol to worship after another, but we have a “God-sized hole” in our hearts that we try to fill with everything but God. We no longer covet, but we are “victimized” by the glossies in the grocery checkout aisle. Left to ourselves, we will never hold to the true definitions of sin. Only the perfect law of God will keep the standards of sin where they are in God’s eyes, so we must proclaim it, verse by verse.
Now, I’m not advocating that Christians set up Ten Commandments displays at the entrances to their offices and ask all who enter to read them, along with a gospel tract. I don’t make this qualification because I think that would be unloving, for it would be the height of love to introduce an unbeliever to the “tutor” that can lead them to Christ, along with the Christ of course (The law without the gospel is as evil as the gospel without the law). Rather, I say this as a matter of expediency, for we are not to cast the precious “pearls” of God’s word before “dogs” and risk that they simply “trample them under their feet, and turn and trample you to pieces” (Matthew 7:6; 1 Corinthians 5:9-11). God’s word is too sacred to be peddled to people who would trample it underfoot. Moreover, fathers need their jobs to provide for their families and Christians need their lives to evangelize those whom God is calling to believe. Getting “trampled to pieces” puts both of these objectives in jeopardy. So Christians need to be wise. How and when they define and expose sin with the law of God in the world is a question that requires much prayer and “divine appointments.” Of course, it is clear that the pulpit is definitely a place for this, for the pulpit is the place for the proclamation of the whole counsel of God (2 Timothy 4:2a).
All of this is to make a brief case for calling sin “sin”, rather than joining the world in its mockery.
Ryan George
Originally published in The Living Water Letter, March 2006
by Living Water of Washington DC.
Last revised: February 17, 2006.